Sounds like you are a bit down and out. You’re best bet is to attend a fetish party. That’s what I do. Btw, most girls that go to such events are into sexual experimentation and have PC’s. You might get doubly lucky!
Some have Mac’s though—not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Girlfriend and Mac are gone now. Easy come, easy go, I suppose. She took off with my punk pants though. Those were a friggin’ elaborate work of art that my dead mother-in-law sewed for me. Ah, well, you know women. They tend to be lying and manipulative. Sometimes, I really wish I was a fag. They must have it easier.
Yeah, those damn atheists trying to ram logic and reason down peoples throats, and taking away the christians god given right to teach the bible in school science class. How dare those uppitty, dawkins lovin’ godless heathens disrespect the Lord and try to take our source of comfort away. Anti-american , I tell ya!
A God for everyone is the best God of all. Nonexistence is not conditional on this quality, it is simply a state which confers greater stature as explained in this vid, and therefore necessitates God’s nonexistence, since an existent being who is both omnipotent and omniscient, is clearly inferior to one who has these attributes, but has no existence.
Again I can’t figure out if you are being serious, half-serious or not serious at all. If you are being serious, that is a serious mistake since I was not. If you are being half-serious, why so wishy washy? If you are not being serious, that’s my #1 guess, then I shall answer in kind..
So, a God for everyone isn’t a God at all ,right?
Not necessarily. A God for everyone might complete everyone in ways that their wishes may have either mislead them or absolutely lied to them about the truth.
Because a being that is imagined is easier to make than a God that is does not necessitate that all imagination is completely wrong.
Suppose you had the imagination of Einstein and could apply it to a workable hypothesis?
Universe has characteristics x, y, z, and as for omni . .
March 29th, 2010 at 7:10 am
Thanks!
March 29th, 2010 at 7:11 am
It isn’t often the word malodourous is slipped into monologe so smoothly. Excellent presentation.
March 29th, 2010 at 7:49 am
Sounds like you are a bit down and out. You’re best bet is to attend a fetish party. That’s what I do. Btw, most girls that go to such events are into sexual experimentation and have PC’s. You might get doubly lucky!
Some have Mac’s though—not that there’s anything wrong with that.
March 29th, 2010 at 8:09 am
Girlfriend and Mac are gone now. Easy come, easy go, I suppose. She took off with my punk pants though. Those were a friggin’ elaborate work of art that my dead mother-in-law sewed for me. Ah, well, you know women. They tend to be lying and manipulative. Sometimes, I really wish I was a fag. They must have it easier.
March 29th, 2010 at 8:31 am
I fave’d this. You were unsurpassable!
March 29th, 2010 at 8:40 am
Yeah!
March 29th, 2010 at 9:23 am
Don’t know. Perhaps it is the work of…
God!
March 29th, 2010 at 10:11 am
Hm, FFreeThinker recently uploaded a shortened version of this vid and it is now set as private, wtf?
March 29th, 2010 at 10:26 am
Yeah, those damn atheists trying to ram logic and reason down peoples throats, and taking away the christians god given right to teach the bible in school science class. How dare those uppitty, dawkins lovin’ godless heathens disrespect the Lord and try to take our source of comfort away. Anti-american , I tell ya!
March 29th, 2010 at 10:57 am
A God for everyone is the best God of all. Nonexistence is not conditional on this quality, it is simply a state which confers greater stature as explained in this vid, and therefore necessitates God’s nonexistence, since an existent being who is both omnipotent and omniscient, is clearly inferior to one who has these attributes, but has no existence.
March 29th, 2010 at 11:55 am
Thanks for adding this vid to your favorites.
Again I can’t figure out if you are being serious, half-serious or not serious at all. If you are being serious, that is a serious mistake since I was not. If you are being half-serious, why so wishy washy? If you are not being serious, that’s my #1 guess, then I shall answer in kind..
March 29th, 2010 at 12:53 pm
So, a God for everyone isn’t a God at all ,right?
Not necessarily. A God for everyone might complete everyone in ways that their wishes may have either mislead them or absolutely lied to them about the truth.
Because a being that is imagined is easier to make than a God that is does not necessitate that all imagination is completely wrong.
Suppose you had the imagination of Einstein and could apply it to a workable hypothesis?
Universe has characteristics x, y, z, and as for omni . .
March 29th, 2010 at 1:36 pm
I know! I was like, “Man, you don’t see this everyday.”
March 29th, 2010 at 1:51 pm
youch!
March 29th, 2010 at 2:27 pm
my face melted
March 29th, 2010 at 3:19 pm
Thanks!
March 29th, 2010 at 4:08 pm
“hyper-rational pig excrement”, eh?…LOL!
I used to watch Trinity..blech*..unbeliveable.
Good video, I thoroughly enjoyed it.
March 29th, 2010 at 4:49 pm
its all me—glad to make you laugh, and thanks for your comment!
March 29th, 2010 at 4:55 pm
omg, the last like 20 seconds was totally worth it. Im curious if you came up with that or if thats some dawkins shit, either way funny.
March 29th, 2010 at 5:34 pm
Good! : )
March 29th, 2010 at 6:07 pm
I nearly choked laughing about that … Inmendham … HAHAHAHA. *high five*
I’m feeling much better btw. Responsible self medication helped =D
March 29th, 2010 at 7:04 pm
You’re such a philosopher.
March 29th, 2010 at 7:32 pm
My computer is down and I have a new girlfriend with a Mac. I hate Macs, but love plunging porksword into her. I guess life can never be perfect.
March 29th, 2010 at 8:11 pm
— Inmendham —
March 29th, 2010 at 8:39 pm
The before and after shots would make for a great ad!